Arjun Jaggi
AI Solutions Engineering · AISE-03 Book a conversation
A Working Briefing

The Defensible Answer

A confident answer is not a defensible one. Answers are cheap. Evidence is not.

Arjun JaggiOctober 16, 202611 slidesPlays in your browser
The Defensible Answer · 11 slides Open full screen ↗
▶  Play full screen
Click the slide to advance, or use the on-screen arrows. Press F for full screen.
Turn the question into an investigation. Keep the record.
The Problem

An agent hands you a fluent answer. It cannot tell you whether to believe it.

Ask a hard question and a confident paragraph arrives in seconds. What does not arrive is what the model weighed, what it skipped, or what it found that pointed the other way. For a demo, that is fine. For a decision that has to hold up later, it is a liability.

The fix is not a better prompt. It is a different shape of work. Turn the question into an investigation that commits what would prove it wrong before it looks, and keeps a record every claim traces back to. Answers are cheap. Evidence is not. This briefing is a working blueprint for that.

ONE QUESTION, TWO ANSWERS Question Answer A PROMPT Nothing kept to check. Registered intent Sources Evidence Checkpoint Answer EVERY CLAIM TRACES BACK
Two answers to the same question. Only one can be checked.
The Briefing

Eleven slides. Here is what they answer.

01What makes an answer defensible, not just fluent?
02How do you say what would prove you wrong, before any evidence exists?
03What is every claim in the answer accountable to?
04Why does a human sit at every checkpoint?
05What is the one move to start with on Monday?

The answers are in the presentation above. Play the briefing, about six minutes.

Keep Reading

Related work

Ready to make your answers defensible?

This is what the work looks like. The next one could be yours.

Start a conversation