Investor Intelligence Tool — Free

Know the Difference Between Real AI and AI Washing

30 questions across 8 dimensions. Designed for VCs, angels, and family offices evaluating AI-first companies. Built on enterprise AI research—not hype.

30scored questions
8investment dimensions
~12minutes to complete
100point composite score
Tell us about the company you are evaluating
Used only in your printed report. Nothing is stored or transmitted.
Data Moat
Does the company own proprietary data that improves the model over time? Or does it just call the same APIs competitors use?
Model Independence
Companies built entirely on top of a single foundation model API have zero technical moat. Evaluate what they actually own.
Unit Economics
Inference costs are real and scaling. Many AI products have inverted gross margins. This is the CFO question most boards aren't asking.
Team Depth
Research pedigree matters—but so does commercial execution. A team that can only build the model, not sell and deploy it, is half a team.
Defensibility
Network effects and switching costs degrade quickly in AI. What makes customers harder to replace in year 3 than year 1?
Customer Evidence
Pilots are free marketing. Enterprise contracts with real SLAs, genuine NRR, and named references are the signal.
Market Timing
AI-native vs. AI-washed. Is the company solving a problem that genuinely requires AI, or adding AI to something that was already solved?
Regulatory Risk
EU AI Act, HIPAA, financial regulations, and sector-specific compliance create asymmetric liability for under-prepared AI companies.

Built on frameworks from Sequoia Capital AI Thesis 2024, a16z AI Stack research, McKinsey AI Value Survey 2024, and enterprise deployment data from 50+ Fortune 500 AI projects.
No data leaves your browser. All scoring runs locally in JavaScript. Nothing is stored or transmitted.

Evaluation Progress 0 / 30
Section 01 — Executive Summary
0 /100
Composite Score
Evaluating…

Eight-Dimension Competency Profile
Evaluated Company
Company
Founders
Stage
Check Size
Section 02 — Dimension Performance Analysis
■ Strong (70%+) ■ Moderate (45–69%) ■ Weak (<45%)
Section 03 — Return Potential Analysis
Investment Verdict Score Range Return Potential Recommended Posture
Return ranges are probability-weighted estimates, not guarantees. They reflect structural characteristics that historically correlate with venture-scale outcomes. Individual results depend on market timing, team execution, and external factors. This report is a diligence aid, not investment advice. Framework by Arjun Jaggi — arjunjaggi.com
Section 04 — Risk Signals & Investment Strengths
Section 05 — Dimension-by-Dimension Findings
Section 06 — Recommended Next Steps
Appendix — Methodology & Framework Basis

The AI Investment Scorecard evaluates companies across eight structural dimensions identified through analysis of enterprise AI deployments and venture-backed AI companies. The framework draws on Sequoia Capital AI Thesis 2024, a16z AI Stack research, McKinsey Global Institute AI Value Survey 2024 (50+ Fortune 500 deployments), NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0, EU AI Act compliance requirements, and primary research from 200+ enterprise AI evaluations. Each dimension is independently scored and combined into a weighted composite. Weights reflect empirical correlation with durable investment outcomes rather than equal weighting.