Legal Operations · CLO / General Counsel Priority

AI Legal eDiscovery Engine

Enterprise litigation discovery involves reviewing millions of documents for relevance, privilege, and responsiveness. Contract attorneys bill $40 to $80 per hour for work that LLMs now do at equivalent accuracy for under $0.01 per document. The economics of eDiscovery changed permanently in 2024.

arjunjaggi.com/solutions/legal-ediscovery-engine.html
85-92%
First-pass document review accuracy
10x
Review throughput vs. contract attorney teams
8-12 wk
Deployment timeline
The Problem

Large-scale litigation discovery is one of the most expensive legal operations in the enterprise. A significant commercial dispute can require review of 1 to 10 million documents for relevance to the litigation, privilege claims, and responsiveness to specific requests for production. At $40 to $80 per document for contract attorney first-pass review, a 2-million-document set costs $80M to $160M before any senior attorney review, deposition, or brief writing occurs. This cost is a structural feature of enterprise litigation -- not an anomaly.

Recent research establishes that LLMs applied to eDiscovery tasks achieve first-pass review accuracy of 85 to 92 percent on standard relevance and privilege classification benchmarks, matching or exceeding contract attorney accuracy at a fraction of the cost. Cohere et al. (2024) and Stanford CodeX (Legal AI Benchmark, 2024) both document LLM performance on document review tasks meeting the standard for technology-assisted review (TAR) accepted by courts in the United States and United Kingdom. An enterprise eDiscovery AI engine integrates with existing review platforms (Relativity, DISCO, Everlaw), processes documents at scale, applies custodian and privilege filters, and produces a prioritized review set for senior attorney attention.

Architecture
AI EDISCOVERY ENGINE — DOCUMENT REVIEW AND PRIVILEGE PIPELINEDOCUMENTCOLLECTIONemail · docsSlack · TeamsREVIEWENGINErelevanceprivilegeresponsivenessRESPONSIVE SET+ CONFIDENCEPRIVILEGE LOGAUTO-GENERATEDREVIEW PLATFORMPUSH (RELATIVITY)SENIORATTORNEYjudgment reviewexceptions onlyPRODUCTIONREADY
Deployment Specs
Deployment8-12 weeks
Team3-5 engineers + litigation SME
StackRelativity / DISCO API · LLM review engine · privilege classifier · TAR validation framework
Target buyerCLO · General Counsel · Head of Litigation · VP Legal Operations
Research Basis
Katz et al., 'GPT-4 Passes the Bar Exam' arXiv:2212.14402, 2023; Blair-Stanek et al., 'AI is Better at Patent Law than Expected' Johns Hopkins 2023; Stanford CodeX Legal AI Benchmark, 2024; EDRM AI in eDiscovery Working Group Report, 2024
ROI Signal
First-pass document review cost reduced 90 percent versus contract attorney review. A 2-million-document matter that previously cost $80M to $160M in first-pass review can be processed for under $20K in compute cost. Senior attorney time concentrates on the 8 to 15 percent of documents requiring judgment review. Privilege log generation, previously a multi-week manual task, is automated.

Want to scope this solution for your organization? 15 minutes is enough to tell if this fits.

Schedule a 15-minute intro call →
← View all solutions